MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A distinct cutaneous reaction to sorafenib and a multikinase inhibitor

2008· letter· en· W2013683617 on OpenAlexaffabout
Valérie Joncas, Mark Krasny, Danielle Bouffard, Nathalie Provost

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Dermatology · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScalpDermatologyPapuleFollicular hyperplasiaHyperkeratosisFolliculitisPathologyHyperplasia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 52-year-old, white male with metastatic renal cancer presented to our clinic with an exquisitely painful papulopustular eruption of the face, scalp, and neck of 4 week's duration, associated with alopecia of his scalp and eyebrows. He described a new onset “sandpaper-like” aspect to his skin. Concurrently, the patient developed painful bullous lesions of his palm and soles. He was undergoing treatment with sorafenib (600 mg/day) for his malignancy, initiated 2 months prior. Physical examination revealed a follicular papulopustular eruption predominantly of the head and neck (Fig. 1), with fewer lesions localized to the genital area. Many of the larger lesions expressed a malodorous purulent discharge. A diffuse eruption of spiny, filiform, follicular hyperkeratoses covered the patient's scalp (2, 3), trunk, and abdomen. Nonscarring alopecia of the scalp and eyebrows was present, along with hyperkeratosis overlying pressure points of his palms and soles. Follicular papulopustular eruption predominantly of the head and neck Spiny, filiform, follicular hyperkeratoses Spiny, filiform, follicular hyperkeratoses (closer view) Biopsy of a hyperkeratotic papule of his scalp revealed dilated hair follicles (comedone like) with orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis and a mild polymorphous infiltrate including lymphocytes, histiocytes, plasma cells, and a few eosinophils. The specimen also revealed squamous metaplasia of many eccrine ducts. The patient noted an improvement of the inflammatory papules and pustules with oral tetracycline combined with topical erythromycin, metronidazole, benzyl peroxide, and fluocinonide cream. Rapid clearance of the spiny papules was noted shortly following the regular application of a urea-based cream. At this point, treatment with sorafenib was suspended for a planned surgery. Similar lesions reappeared shortly after reinstitution of his treatment. Research in molecular biology has led to the development of specific molecules targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and several other unrelated signaling pathways. Recently, cutaneous reactions to EGFR inhibitors have been described in the dermatology literature. Common cutaneous adverse reactions to EGFR inhibitors include acneiform eruption, xerosis, and paronychia.1 Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006, Nexavar®, Bayer, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) is one of the new-generation oral small-molecule kinase inhibitor targeting both tumor cells and tumor vasculature, not primarily related to EGFR. It inhibits the kinase activity of both C-Raf and B-Raf, which are encoded by oncogenes. It also targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (PDGFR-B and kit).2 Since December 2005, the FDA has approved its use for treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer. The most common dermatological adverse events seen with sorafenib in a phase-3 study were reported as “rash” and “hand-foot skin reactions”.3 An acneiform eruption was also reported with the use of sorafenib in combination with an EGFR inhibitor.4 Less common cutaneous adverse events are subungueal splinter hemorrhages and erythemato-squamous eruptions of the nasofacial area.5 Sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme,6 keratoacanthomas,7 and inflammation of actinic keratosis8 have also been described. Hyperkeratotic spicules of the face, scalp, palms, and soles have been described in the setting of various clinical entities such as monoclonal gammopathy.9 While the hyperkeratotic spicules in our case clinically resemble these lesions, histopathology demonstrated a comedone-like follicular dilatation consistent with an acneiform process. This unique presentation of hyperkeratotic spicules, in addition to the severe papulopustular eruption following the initiation and reinstitution of sorafenib therapy, strongly implicates this drug as the causal agent. To our knowledge, this very distinct sorafenib-induced eruption has not yet been described in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of DermatologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207