The Design of Flanges Based on Flexibility and Tightness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the leakage tightness consideration, the behavior of gasketed joint relies very much on the actual gasket load and its variation during the different operating conditions. With the future implementation by the ASME of new design rules based on tightness, a more meaningful and precise evaluation of the gasket load is useful for the purpose of improved prediction of joint tightness. A new design procedure based on the traditional code design philosophy that also accounts for the flexibility of all elements of the joint as well as tightness and gasket creep is suggested. In this paper a general comprehensive method based on the gasket-bolt-flange elastic interaction is presented for the analysis of the joint. The proposed analytical model that is implemented in the “TightFlange” program will be supported by a numerical FEM and experimental investigations to assess the effect of the mechanical and thermal loading including pressure, external loads, thermal expansion and gasket creep on the leakage behavior of gaskets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it