MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013737426 · doi:10.1016/j.jvsc.2015.01.001

Development of endotension after multiple rounds of thrombolysis after endovascular aneurysm repair

2015· article· en· W2013737426 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica Belchos, Mark Wheatcroft, Vikramaditya Prabhudesai, Tony Moloney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular Surgery Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmEndovascular aneurysm repairThrombolysisSurgeryComplicationStentThrombosisRadiologyAbdominal aortic aneurysmCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoleaks, defined as blood flow outside the graft but inside the aneurysm sac, are a common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair. Sometimes however, for reasons not fully understood, expansion of the aneurysm sac can occur with no identifiable endoleak, a phenomenon termed endotension, or a type V endoleak. We describe a case of endotension in a 71-year-old man that developed after recurrent stent graft thrombosis requiring thrombolysis 3 years after the initial endovascular implantation. To our knowledge, this is the first description in the literature of endotension after multiple rounds of thrombolytic treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vascular Surgery CasesSame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207