MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013742516 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2000.9669897

Maternal Participation in the Labour Market and Child Education Outcome in Developing Countries

2000· article· en· W2013742516 on OpenAlexaffvenue
B. Mak Arvin, Jennifer L. Summers

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeveloping countryContext (archaeology)Outcome (game theory)Developed countryChild labourEconomicsPolitical scienceEconomic growthDemographic economicsMedicineGeographyEnvironmental healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much is known about the effect of resources, school practices, and peer groups upon children's educational achievement. However, little is known about the association between maternal employment and child education outcome. In the context of developing countries, it has not even been explored yet. This paper proposes to explicate the links between the participation of mothers in the labour market and child education in LDCs, based on data covering thirteen countries for the period 1975 to 1993. The results suggest that maternal participation in the labour market has a positive impact on the educational achievement of children (defined as primary school enrollment) in richer developing countries but a negative one in poorer countries. These findings are explained in terms of direct and indirect effects of maternal employment on child education outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareFrench-language works237,207