MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013759365 · doi:10.1190/1.2831680

A progressive geophysical exploration strategy at the Shea Creek uranium deposit

2008· article· en· W2013759365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grant Nimeck

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyUraniumMining engineeringGeochemistryGeophysicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Athabasca Basin is a large Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic quartz arenite sandstone basin that occupies most of the northernmost quarter of Sas-katchewan and a smaller portion of northeastern Alberta. The locations of the basin and the uranium discoveries discussed in this paper are shown in Figure 1. The majority of the unconformity-type uranium deposits of the Athabasca Basin are sandstone-hosted and are associated with post-Hudsonian, reactivated graphitic faults within Aphebian metasedimentary gneisses of the Wollaston Domain and the Wollaston-Mudjatik transition zone in the eastern portion of the Athabasca Basin. However, the Shea Creek deposit, consisting of the Anne, Kianna, and Colette zones, occurs in the western portion of the basin and is associated with the transition between the granitic Clearwater Domain and the Lloyd Domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207