MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013761273 · doi:10.1252/jcej.08we140

Compartmental Modeling of a Structured Heat Exchanger Reactor: Conversion and Temperature Profiles Predictions

2009· article· en· W2013761273 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerHeat transferMixing (physics)Modular designFlexibility (engineering)Mass transferChemical reactorProcess engineeringTransport phenomenaThermodynamicsNuclear engineeringMechanical engineeringMechanicsChemistryComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the last ten years numerous studies have been carried out to develop micro-reactors or micro-structured reactors in order to improve scale of production, economics, safety and environmental impact of chemical production. Consequently Alfa Laval Vicarb has developed a new structured heat exchanger reactor. The design of the reactor is based on high performances heat plate exchanger in which small inserts allow a good mixing of the reactants and to improve the heat transfer phenomena or to increase the heat transfer coefficient. This new technology of heat plate exchange reactors has a modular structure where the exchange zones have two possible configurations: co- and counter counter-current. The structure of the reactor is also flexible, that makes possible to have multiple reactants injections and different local temperature control points. In order to have a rapid prediction of conversion and temperature profiles, a mathematical model conserving the same notion of the structure of the reactor has been developed. This mathematical model is a simple compartmental model which presents advantages in terms of flexibility, possible online simulations and rapid prediction simulations. The structure of the model has been determined with the help of tracer experiment and computational fluid dynamics simulations. Heat and mass transfer equations are written considering each cell and using experimental heat transfer data then chemical kinetics from literature are introduced to the model. A sub-compartmental model has been developed in order to predict the micro-mixing phenomena. Four reactions for which the kinetic laws of reactions are well known have been selected to test the model: alkaline hydrolysis of ethyl acetate, alkaline hydrolysis of ethylene glycol diacetate, oxidation of sodium thiosulphate by hydrogen peroxide and Bourne reactions. The results of comparison between simulations and experimental data in terms of yield, selectivity, temperature profiles and micro-mixing characteristics are in reasonable agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it