MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013781849 · doi:10.1021/es0516209

A Field Experiment To Determine the Relative Importance of Prey and Water as Sources of As, Cd, Co, Cu, Pb, and Zn for the Aquatic Invertebrate <i>Sialis velata</i>

2005· article· en· W2013781849 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louis Croisetière, Landis Hare, André Tessier

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrace elementEnvironmental chemistryChironomus ripariusPredationTrace metalBenthic zonePredatorInvertebrateFood webEcologyBiologyEnvironmental scienceChemistryLarvaMidgeMetal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured the relative importance of water and food as sources of the trace elements As, Cd, Co, Cu, Pb, and Zn for larvae of the benthic insect Sialis velata. To achieve this end, we first exposed its prey, the midge Chironomus riparius, to trace elements in a contaminated lake located near a nonferrous metal smelter in northwestern Quebec. Concentrations of five of the six trace elements reached a steady state in prey within one week. When predators were exposed to these contaminated prey, their trace element concentrations increased markedly for all of the trace elements studied. In contrast, exposure of S. velata to contaminated lake water led to no significant increase in their concentrations of five of the six trace elements ([Pb] increased only slightly). Additional treatments in which the predator was exposed to these trace elements in both food and water or in a combination of food and water and sediment did not lead to further increases in its contaminant concentrations beyond those measured in the food-only treatment. We conclude that food (prey) is the almost exclusive source of As, Cd, Co, Cu, and Zn for S. velata and that it is the source of 94% of its Pb. Model curves for trace element accumulation over time by the predator fit our measured data well, and trace element concentrations in food alone are sufficient to model the exchange of these contaminants in this insect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyFrench-language works237,207