MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013792914 · doi:10.1117/12.406320

Mode locking of a ring cavity semiconductor diode laser

2000· article· en· W2013792914 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Desbiens, Ararat Yesayan, Michel Piché

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsSemiconductor laser theoryMaterials sciencePulse durationLaserOptoelectronicsOptical amplifierAmplifierDiodeGratingPulse (music)Mode-lockingBandwidth-limited pulsePulse wavePicosecondPhysicsUltrashort pulse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report new results on the generation and characterization of picosecond pulses from a self-mode-locked semiconductor diode laser. The active medium (InGaAs, 830-870 nm) is a semiconductor optical amplifier whose facets are cut at angle and AR coated. The amplifier is inserted in a three-minor ring cavity. Mode locking is purely passive; it takes place for specific alignment conditions. Trains of counterpropagating pulses are produced, with pulse duration varying from 1 .2 to 2 ps. The spectra of the counterpropagatmg pulses do not fully overlap; their central wavelengths differ by a few nm. The pulse repetition rate has been varied from 0.3 to 3 GHz. The pulses have been compressed to less than 500-fs duration with a grating pair. We discuss some of the potential physical mechanisms that could be involved in the dynamics of the mode-locked regime. Hysteresis in the LI curve has been observed. To characterize the pulses, we introduce the idea of a Pulse Quality Factor, where the pulse duration and spectral width are calculated from the second-order moments of the measured intensity autocorrelation and power spectral density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207