MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013793198 · doi:10.1002/pen.20942

A practical approach to modeling time‐dependent nonlinear creep behavior of polyethylene for structural applications

2007· article· en· W2013793198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Engineering and Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepViscoelasticityPolyethyleneMaterials scienceNonlinear systemConstitutive equationStiffnessStress (linguistics)Phenomenological modelStructural engineeringComposite materialMechanicsFinite element methodEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The purpose of this work is to develop a practical method for constitutive modeling of polyethylene, based on a phenomenological approach, which can be applied for structural analysis. Polyethylene is increasingly used as a structural material, for example, in pipes installed by trenchless methods, where the relatively low stiffness of polyethylene reduces the required installation forces, chemical inertness makes it applicable for corrosive environments, and adequate strength allows its use in sewer, gas, and water lines. Polyethylene exhibits time‐dependent constitutive behavior which is also dependent on the applied stress level resulting in nonlinear stress–strain relationships. Nonlinear viscoelastic theory has been well established and a variety of modeling approaches have been derived from it. To realistically utilize the nonlinear modeling approaches in design, a simple method is needed for finding a constitutive formulation for a specific polyethylene type. This paper presents such a practical approach to nonlinear viscoelastic modeling utilizing both the multi‐Kelvin element theory and the power law functions to model creep compliance. Creep tests are used to determine material parameters and models are generated for four different polyethylene materials. The corroboration of the models is completed by comparisons with results from different tensile creep, step‐loading creep, and load‐rate tests. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 48:159–167, 2008. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it