MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013798700 · doi:10.1109/robio.2013.6739586

Adaptive reinforcement Q-Learning algorithm for swarm-robot system using pheromone mechanism

2013· article· en· W2013798700 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiguo Shi, Jun Tu, Yuankai Li, Zeying Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningSwarm roboticsSwarm behaviourComputer scienceRobotAnt colony optimization algorithmsAnt roboticsSwarm intelligenceArtificial intelligenceMechanism (biology)Mathematical optimizationMobile robotAlgorithmParticle swarm optimizationRobot controlMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The states and actions of the robots in uncertain environments are continuous, which will easily lead to the problem of slow learning speed and the combinatorial explosion issue of the reinforcement learning. Ant colony optimization (ACO) is an evolution algorithm based on swarm mechanism that takes full advantage of the pheromone mechanism to simplify the information sharing and collaborative issues between the swarm individuals. Adaptive robust reinforcement Q-Learning algorithm based on ACO is proposed from two parts: adaptive discretization part and pheromone part. Firstly, adaptive discretization of the continuous input space is realized by the self-organizing neural network. Secondly, the pheromone mechanism of ACO is introduced to improve the traditional reinforcement learning process, which can improve the adaptive capabilities of the system and reduce the space complexity of accelerating the learning speed of the swarm robots. Player/Stage is used as the simulation platform to verify the proposed algorithm. The results show proposed algorithm has efficiency and adaptive capacity in the swarm robotic system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElevator Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207