Quantification of Exopolysaccharide, Lactic Acid, and Lactose Concentrations in Culture Broth by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was used for the simultaneous prediction of exopolysaccharide (EPS; 0-3 g/L) and lactic acid (0-59 g/L) productions as well as lactose (0-68 g/L) concentration in supernatant samples from pH-controlled batch cultures of Lactobacillus rhamnosus RW-9595M in supplemented whey permeate medium. To develop calibration equations, the correlation between the second derivative of 164 NIRS transmittance spectra and concentration data obtained with reference methods was calculated at the wavelength between 1653-1770 and 2041-2353 nm, using a partial least-squares method (PLS). The lactic acid and lactose concentrations were measured by HPLC, and the EPS concentration was estimated by a new ultrafiltration method. The PLS correlation coefficient (R(2)) and the standard error of cross-validation for the calibrations were 91% and 0.26 g/L for EPS, 99% and 2.54 g/L for lactic acid, and 98% and 3.32 g/L for lactose, respectively. The calibration equations were validated with 45 randomly selected culture samples from 6 cultures that were not used for calibration. A high agreement between data of the reference methods and those of NIRS was observed, with correlation coefficients and standard errors of prediction of 99% and 1.64 g/L for lactic acid, 99% and 4.5 g/L for lactose, and 91% and 0.32 g/L for EPS. The results suggest that NIRS could be a useful method for rapid monitoring and control of EPS lactic fermentations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".