Strain pseudospins with power-law interactions: Glassy textures of a cooled coupled-map lattice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a spin-1 model of strain pseudospins $S(\stackrel{P\vec}{r})=0,\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ that arise from a triple-well Landau free energy for a square/rectangle or ``austenite-martensite'' structural transformation of a two-dimensional lattice. The pseudospin model has elastic-compatibility-induced power-law anisotropic (PLA) interactions and no quenched disorder. The iteratively solved local mean-field equations for $⟨S(\stackrel{P\vec}{r},t)⟩$ form a temperature-dependent PLA-coupled nonlinear-map lattice, where $t$ is the iteration ``time.'' On cooling at a constant rate, the excess entropy shows a weak roll-off near a temperature $T={T}_{g}$ and a sharper elbow at a lower ${T}^{\ensuremath{\ast}}$, just above a Kauzmann-type ${T}_{K}$ where the excess entropy would have become negative. The crossover temperatures ${T}_{g},{T}^{\ensuremath{\ast}}$ decrease logarithmically with cooling rate and mark stability changes in spatiotemporal attractors of the cooled PLA-coupled map. Three phases in $⟨S(\stackrel{P\vec}{r},t)⟩$ are found, with textures of the martensitic-variant domain walls as ``inherent structures.'' There is a high-temperature $(T>{T}_{g})$ fine scale phase of feathery domain walls and an intermediate temperature $({T}_{g}>T>{T}^{\ensuremath{\ast}})$ phase of mazelike domain walls, with both showing square-wave oscillations as predominantly period-two attractors but with minority-frequency subharmonic clusters. Finally, there is a low-temperature freezing $({T}^{\ensuremath{\ast}}>T)$ to a static fixed point or period-one attractor of coarse, irregular bidiagonal twins, as in a strain glass. A Haar-wavelet analysis is used to identify the local attractor dynamics. A central result is that dynamically heterogeneous and mobile low-strain droplets act as catalysts, and can form correlated chains or transient ``catalytic corrals'' to incubate an emerging local texture. The hotspot lifetime vanishes linearly in $T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{K}$, suggesting that ${T}_{K}$ is a dynamic spinodal limit for generating the ``austenitic'' catalyst, the disappearance of which drives a trapping into one of many bidiagonal glassy states. The model has relevance to martensitic or complex-oxide textures, coupled-map lattices, and configurational-glass transitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".