MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013840503 · doi:10.1121/1.2934517

Optimization problem for the automatic positioning of flow obstructions to control tonal fan noise

2008· article· en· W2013840503 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Gérard, Alain Berry, Patrice Masson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLift (data mining)MicrophoneAcousticsNoise (video)PhysicsRotor (electric)AeroacousticsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceSound pressureControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tonal noise from subsonic axial fans can be controlled by adding obstructions in the downstream or upstream flow field of the rotor. These obstructions must be located with care to create secondary circumferential modes of the blade unsteady lift of equal magnitude but opposite in phase with the primary unsteady lift modes responsible for the tonal noise. The general optimization problem of controlling N circumferential modes using N obstructions with 2 degrees of freedom or 2N obstructions with 1 degree of freedom is first posed. This optimization problem can be greatly simplified using nB-perdiodic obstructions (where B is the number of blade) designed to control the most radiating mode of the blade unsteady lift at frequencies n×BPF. In this case, the control of each frequency is uncoupled and a single error microphone in the axis of the fan can be used to globally control the selected frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207