The Role of Zinc Binding in the Biological Activity of Botulinum Toxin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Botulinum toxin is a zinc-dependent endoprotease that acts on vulnerable cells to cleave polypeptides that are essential for exocytosis. To exert this poisoning effect, the toxin must proceed through a complex sequence of events that involves binding, productive internalization, and intracellular expression of catalytic activity. Results presented in this study show that soluble chelators rapidly strip Zn(2+) from its binding site in botulinum toxin, and this stripping of cation results in the loss of catalytic activity in cell-free or broken cell preparations. Stripped toxin is still active against intact neuromuscular junctions, presumably because internalized toxin binds cytosolic Zn(2+). In contrast to soluble chelators, immobilized chelators have no effect on bound Zn(2+), nor do they alter toxin activity. The latter finding is because of the fact that the spontaneous loss of Zn(2+) from its coordination site in botulinum toxin is relatively slow. When exogenous Zn(2+) is added to toxin that has been stripped by soluble chelators, the molecule rebinds cation and regains catalytic and neuromuscular blocking activity. Exogenous Zn(2+) can restore toxin activity either when the toxin is free in solution on the cell exterior or when it has been internalized and is in the cytosol. The fact that stripped toxin can reach the cytosol means that the loss of bound Zn(2+) does not produce conformational changes that block internalization. Similarly, the fact that stripped toxin in the cytosol can be reactivated by ambient Zn(2+) or exogenous Zn(2+) means that productive internalization does not produce conformational changes that block rebinding of cation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".