Bibliographic record
Abstract
Celebrating the past and planning the futureOver a quarter of century ago, 27 years actually, the first issue of the Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology was published.The SJO has a long and rich history in serving the ophthalmic community in the Kingdom, Gulf States and the Middle East.The SJO is published by one of the first medical societies formed in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and is the official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society with support from King Saud University.The first issue of SJO was published in January 1986 as the Saudi Bulletin of Ophthalmology.In 1991 the name was changed to the Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology to reflect the true spirit and mission of the Society and the Journal.Since inception, the journal's mission has been to provide high quality clinical and scientific manuscripts relevant to eye diseases in the region.However the advent of the Internet meant that most scientists and clinicians eventually adopted online searches for relevant information and knowledge.Additionally many authors will only submit to Journals that are indexed in online scientific databases in order to increase the visibility of their research.In keeping with this reality, the SJO proactively addressed this issue and it is my pleasure to announce that the Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology (SJO) is now indexed in PubMed Central.PubMed Central is the most used biomedical bibliographic database and is an authoritative source of knowledge for clinicians and scientists worldwide.This milestone could not have been achieved without the past and current support of the King Saud University, our Editorial and Advisory Boards, the Reviewers and Authors.With its support, King Saud University has provided the Journal, a platform to reach a global audience.King Saud University assisted in the provision of services from Elsevier, one of the leading publishers of scientific journals.This enabled all submissions to be processed online with technical support available to Authors, Reviewers and the Editors.The outcome include faster manuscript processing, reduced costs, instant reports, transparency of the publication process and timely publication of manuscript.From 2009 onwards, the journal has been available online (www.saudi- ophthaljournal.com),via
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.032 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.026 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".