Bisphosphonate Remains Highly Localized After Elution From Porous Implants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local elution of zoledronic acid from a porous implant reportedly enhances periimplant bone formation and implant fixation. However, there is no information in the literature on the extent to which eluted bisphosphonate remains localized around the implant or becomes systemically distributed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We ascertained to what extent eluted zoledronic acid remains local and whether there is systemic exposure after local elution from porous implants. METHODS: A hydroxyapatite-coated porous tantalum implant dosed with 100 μg (14)C-labeled zoledronic acid was implanted into the left femoral intramedullary canal of six dogs. Bone samples near to and distant from the implant were harvested from three dogs at 6 weeks and three dogs at 52 weeks. The concentration of radiolabeled bisphosphonate in each sample was quantified using liquid scintillation spectrophotometry and its distribution in periimplant bone was revealed by exposing histologic sections to autoradiography film. RESULTS: In all six dogs, the concentration of zoledronic acid in immediate periimplant bone was two orders of magnitude higher than in any other sampled tissue, averaging 732.6 ng/g at 6 weeks and 377.2 ng/g at 52 weeks. Minute amounts of zoledronic acid (≤ 7.2 ng/g) were detected throughout the skeleton, indicating some escape into the circulation after local elution. Autoradiographs revealed the greatest concentration of zoledronic acid on and within the implant, with rapid decrease short distances away and no uptake within the femoral cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid eluted from an implant remains mainly localized with minimal systemic distribution. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Local bisphosphonate elution reduces the risk of systemic side effects and skeletal bisphosphonate exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".