MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013890630 · doi:10.3138/ctr.152.38

UBU at the Museum—Imaginary Travels through the World of Jean Paul Gaultier

2012· article· en· W2013890630 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stéphanie Jasmin, Neil Kroetsch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)The ImaginaryAestheticsNatural (archaeology)Visual artsOpenness to experienceArtThe artsArt historySociologyHistoryPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The universe of Jean Paul Gaultier teems with forms and interminglings. Jasmin characterizes Gaultier as a free-spirited artist who draws his inspiration from cinema, literature, the visual arts and music, as well as ethnic and street cultures. That openness and his boundless imagination provided Denis Marleau and Stéphanie Jasmin with extensive leeway in conceiving the dramatic framework for the mannequins. They had already been fleshing out the characters before any writing was done, discovering photos of their garments and the theme of the fashion collection from which they hailed. Jasmin reflects, “The characters were already speaking to us, as it were. That natural theatricality immediately exploded in all its splendour. One fundamental question we posed concerned that inherent emotional force of the mannequins, whether it was really necessary to dramatize them any further.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0220.013
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicScience Education and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207