MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013890630 · doi:10.3138/ctr.152.38

UBU at the Museum—Imaginary Travels through the World of Jean Paul Gaultier

2012· article· en· W2013890630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicScience Education and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)The ImaginaryAestheticsNatural (archaeology)Visual artsOpenness to experienceArtThe artsArt historySociologyHistoryPsychoanalysisPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The universe of Jean Paul Gaultier teems with forms and interminglings. Jasmin characterizes Gaultier as a free-spirited artist who draws his inspiration from cinema, literature, the visual arts and music, as well as ethnic and street cultures. That openness and his boundless imagination provided Denis Marleau and Stéphanie Jasmin with extensive leeway in conceiving the dramatic framework for the mannequins. They had already been fleshing out the characters before any writing was done, discovering photos of their garments and the theme of the fashion collection from which they hailed. Jasmin reflects, “The characters were already speaking to us, as it were. That natural theatricality immediately exploded in all its splendour. One fundamental question we posed concerned that inherent emotional force of the mannequins, whether it was really necessary to dramatize them any further.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it