Surveillance biopsies are superior to functional studies for the diagnosis of acute and chronic renal allograft pathology in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this report of our 3-yr protocol biopsy program, we describe the evolution of acute rejection (AR) and chronic renal allograft nephropathy (CAN) in a cohort of 21 children treated with antibody induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The aims of this study were to compare the pathogenicity of clinical acute rejection (CAR) and subclinical acute rejection (SAR), and to determine whether functional studies accurately represent acute and chronic renal allograft pathology in pediatric recipients with disproportionately large grafts. Using concurrent biopsies, we evaluated: (i) the utility of changes in the baseline sCr (DeltasCr) to predict both the onset of AR and the response to immunosuppressive therapy; and (ii) the relationship of the calculated creatinine clearance and the presence of pathologic proteinuria to the severity of CAN. We performed 112 biopsies: 11 donor, 73 protocol, 16 acute graft dysfunction and 12 1-month follow-up AR therapy. CAR and SAR were similar in incidence, timing and histologic severity. Progression of CAN was associated with the first episode of CAR (p < 0.02) and the cumulative number of episodes of CAR (p < 0.01), SAR (p < 0.05), CAR plus SAR (p < 0.002) and borderline SAR (B-SAR) (p < 0.006). One-month post-treatment DeltasCrs could not distinguish 1-month follow-up biopsies with histologically confirmed worsened or unchanged AR from those with improved histology (35.2 +/- 74.8% vs. 23.8 +/- 24.9%, p = NS). These findings led to the addition of anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy in five of 10 (50%) cases. Despite 100% 3-yr actuarial graft survival and excellent function (GFR = 111 +/- 36 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 18 of 21 (86%) patients had grade I CAN or greater chronic histology at a mean +/- sd follow-up period of 18.2 +/- 13.1 months. Thirteen of 21 (62%) patients progressed to grade I CAN at 5.2 +/- 3.6 months and five (38%) of these patients progressed to grade II CAN at 17.8 +/- 11.3 months. Schwartz GFR did not differ between patients with or without CAN (108 +/- 38 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 127 +/- 8 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = NS). In biopsies with CAN and no associated AR, neither the Banff chronic tubulointerstitial (Banff ci) score nor the Banff chronic grade correlated with the GFR. Proteinuria was not associated with CAN. Clinical AR and SAR are similar histologic lesions with a capacity for CAN progression. In pediatric renal transplant recipients, longitudinal protocol biopsies are superior to functional studies for the diagnosis and post-therapeutic monitoring of AR and for the surveillance of CAN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".