MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Surveillance biopsies are superior to functional studies for the diagnosis of acute and chronic renal allograft pathology in children

2004· article· en· W2013924638 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubclinical infectionChronic allograft nephropathyPrednisoneProteinuriaBiopsyTacrolimusInternal medicineCumulative incidenceGastroenterologyCohortCreatinineIncidence (geometry)ImmunosuppressionNephropathyUrologyTransplantationPathologyKidneyKidney transplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this report of our 3-yr protocol biopsy program, we describe the evolution of acute rejection (AR) and chronic renal allograft nephropathy (CAN) in a cohort of 21 children treated with antibody induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The aims of this study were to compare the pathogenicity of clinical acute rejection (CAR) and subclinical acute rejection (SAR), and to determine whether functional studies accurately represent acute and chronic renal allograft pathology in pediatric recipients with disproportionately large grafts. Using concurrent biopsies, we evaluated: (i) the utility of changes in the baseline sCr (DeltasCr) to predict both the onset of AR and the response to immunosuppressive therapy; and (ii) the relationship of the calculated creatinine clearance and the presence of pathologic proteinuria to the severity of CAN. We performed 112 biopsies: 11 donor, 73 protocol, 16 acute graft dysfunction and 12 1-month follow-up AR therapy. CAR and SAR were similar in incidence, timing and histologic severity. Progression of CAN was associated with the first episode of CAR (p < 0.02) and the cumulative number of episodes of CAR (p < 0.01), SAR (p < 0.05), CAR plus SAR (p < 0.002) and borderline SAR (B-SAR) (p < 0.006). One-month post-treatment DeltasCrs could not distinguish 1-month follow-up biopsies with histologically confirmed worsened or unchanged AR from those with improved histology (35.2 +/- 74.8% vs. 23.8 +/- 24.9%, p = NS). These findings led to the addition of anti-lymphocyte antibody therapy in five of 10 (50%) cases. Despite 100% 3-yr actuarial graft survival and excellent function (GFR = 111 +/- 36 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), 18 of 21 (86%) patients had grade I CAN or greater chronic histology at a mean +/- sd follow-up period of 18.2 +/- 13.1 months. Thirteen of 21 (62%) patients progressed to grade I CAN at 5.2 +/- 3.6 months and five (38%) of these patients progressed to grade II CAN at 17.8 +/- 11.3 months. Schwartz GFR did not differ between patients with or without CAN (108 +/- 38 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 127 +/- 8 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = NS). In biopsies with CAN and no associated AR, neither the Banff chronic tubulointerstitial (Banff ci) score nor the Banff chronic grade correlated with the GFR. Proteinuria was not associated with CAN. Clinical AR and SAR are similar histologic lesions with a capacity for CAN progression. In pediatric renal transplant recipients, longitudinal protocol biopsies are superior to functional studies for the diagnosis and post-therapeutic monitoring of AR and for the surveillance of CAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it