How Does Flexibility in Body Composition Relate to Seasonal Changes in Metabolic Performance in a Small Passerine Wintering at Northern Latitude?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Small avian species wintering at northern latitudes typically show increases in basal metabolic rate (BMR) and maximal thermogenic capacity (Msum). Those are widely assumed to reflect changes in body composition, with enlargement of digestive and excretory organs resulting in elevated winter BMR and larger body muscles driving the increase in Msum. Using free-living black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) as our model species, we investigated seasonal changes in body composition and tested for relationships between mass variations of body organs and variability of both BMR and Msum. Our results confirmed the expected winter increase in mass of body muscles and cardiopulmonary organs (heart + lungs) and showed that 64% of the observed Msum variations throughout the year were explained by changes in these organs. In contrast, we found little support for an effect of the digestive organs (gizzard + intestines) on BMR seasonal changes. Instead, this variable was mainly influenced by variations in mass of body muscles and excretory organs (liver + kidney), explaining up to 35% of its variability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".