MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013956662 · doi:10.1055/s-2009-1216399

Antimalarial Agents from Plants: Neocryptolepine Derivatives and Standardised Extracts from Traditional Medicine

2009· article· en· W2013956662 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Luc Pieters

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanta Medica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSynthesis and bioactivity of alkaloids
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseAgricultural Research ServiceNational Center for Complementary and Alternative MedicineNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaUniversity of ColomboUniversity Grants CommissionTata TrustsInternational Science CouncilKurukshetra UniversityChina Academy of Traditional Chinese MedicineWestern Carolina UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaDeutsche KrebshilfeNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Institutes of HealthTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesWake Forest University
KeywordsPlasmodium bergheiTraditional medicineAntimalarial AgentIn vivoBark (sound)MalariaRubiaceaePharmacologyQuinolineBiologyChemistryMedicineChloroquineBotanyBiotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants are still an important resource for the discovery of new drugs, such as new antimalarial agents. In search for novel antimalarial compounds, we focused on neocryptolepine (5-methyl-5H-indolo[2,3-b]quinoline), one of the minor alkaloids of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, a plant used in traditional medicine in Central and West Africa. A series of chloro- and aminoalkylamino-substituted neocryptolepine derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as antiplasmodial agents. The evaluation included cytotoxicity (MRC5 cells), inhibition of β-hematin formation and DNA-interactions (DNA/methyl green assay). Introduction of aminoalkylamino chains increased the antiplasmodial activity of the neocryptolepine core substantially. The most active compounds showed antiplasmodial activities in the nM range. Nevertheless, some compounds that were selected for in vivo evaluation in infected mice were not sufficiently active, or toxic to the animals. A different approach to develop antimalarial drugs from nature is the standardisation of plant extracts with a proven efficacy used in traditional medicine. Nauclea pobeguinii (Rubiaceae) is a tree from which the bark is widely used in African traditional medicine against malaria-like symptoms. Alkaloids such as the major compound strictosamide are expected to be responsible for the activity. An HPLC method was developed and validated for the quantification of strictosamide in an 80% EtOH extract of the stem bark of N. pobeguinii. This extract, containing 5.6% (w/w) strictosamide, was evaluated in vivo in the Plasmodium berghei mouse model in a suppressive treatment regimen. It was orally dosed (PO) at 300 mg/kg 2 ×/day during 5 consecutive days. Another group was treated intraperitoneally (IP) at 50 mg/kg using the same dosing regimen. Treatment with the crude extract, either after oral or intraperitoneal dosing, resulted in moderate depression of parasitaemia during dosing, however quickly followed by a full relapse (mean survival time = about 13 days). At termination of the experiment at day 21, a single survivor in the PO group was apparently cured (no parasitaemia), the single survivor in the IP group showed high parasitaemia and was in a moribund state. It can be concluded that the crude extract of N. pobeguinii has slight antimalarial potential when administered orally in a suppressive dosing regimen of 2 × 5 days at 300 mg/kg. Longer treatment may be necessary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanta MedicaSame topicSynthesis and bioactivity of alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207