MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013957578 · doi:10.1002/jmv.2142

TT virus: Preferential distribution in CD19<sup>+</sup> peripheral blood mononuclear cells and lack of viral integration

2001· article· en· W2013957578 on OpenAlexaff
Qigui Yu, Bruce Shiramizu, Vivek R. Nerurkar, Ningjie Hu, Cecilia M. Shikuma, Marian E. Melish, Karin E. Cascio, Allison Imrie, Yuanan Lu, Richard Yanagihara

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Virology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsCanada Research Chairs
FundersNational Center for Research Resources
KeywordsPeripheral blood mononuclear cellVirologyBiologyCD19Molecular biologyVirusCD3Primer (cosmetics)DNANucleaseAntigenIn vitroChemistryImmunologyFlow cytometryCD8Genetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to determine whether peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) contain proviral DNA or double-stranded replicative forms of TT virus (TTV) and to define which cell subset harbors TTV, we analyzed 126 PBMC DNA samples by PCR, using the NG059/NG061/NG063 and the T801/T935 primer sets. TTV sequences were detected in nearly 20% (25/126) of PBMC DNA samples. Analysis of PBMC subsets revealed that TTV was preferentially distributed in CD19(+) cells. TTV DNA was also detected in CD3(+)/CD19(+) double-depleted cells but was undetectable in CD3(+) cells. After degradation of single-stranded DNA using mung bean nuclease (MBN), TTV could not be detected in previously TTV-positive PBMC DNA samples nor in DNA from CD19(+) cells, CD3(+)-depleted, and CD3(+)/CD19(+) double-depleted cells, indicating the lack of TTV DNA integration and the absence of viral double-stranded replicative intermediates in PBMC or PBMC subset cells. Our data indicate that PBMC and PBMC subsets are not the major sites of TTV replication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical VirologySame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207