Novel embedded image coding algorithms based on wavelet difference reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wavelet difference reduction (WDR) has recently been proposed as a method for efficient embedded image coding. In this paper, the WDR algorithm is analysed and four new techniques are proposed to either reduce its complexity or improve its rate distortion (RD) performance. The first technique, dubbed modified WDR-A (MWDR-A), focuses on improving the efficiency of the arithmetic coding (AC) stage of the WDR. Based on experiments with the statistics of the output symbol sequence, it is shown that the symbols can either be arithmetic coded under different contexts or output without AC. In the second technique, MWDR-B, the AC stage is dropped from the coder. By employing MWDR-B, up to 20% of coding time can be saved without sacrificing the RD performance, when compared to WDR. The third technique focuses on the improvement of RD performance using context modelling. A low-complexity context model is proposed to exploit the statistical dependency among the wavelet coefficients. This technique is termed context-modelled WDR (CM-WDR), and acts without the AC stage to improve the RD performance by up to 1.5 dB over WDR on a set of test images, at various bit rates. The fourth technique combines CM-WDR with AC and achieves a 0.2 dB improvement over CM-WDR in terms of PSNR. The proposed techniques retain all the features of WDR, including low complexity, region-of-interest capability, and embeddedness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".