MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2013966593 · doi:10.1190/1.3054785

Microphone experiments and applications in exploration seismology

2008· article· en· W2013966593 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alejandro D. Alcudia, Robert R. Stewart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsGeologySeismologyMicrophoneComputer scienceAcousticsGeophysicsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coupling phenomena associated with energy conversion at the air‐ground interface can be better understood if pressure levels and particle velocity, displacement or acceleration amplitudes are recorded in the field. In exploration seismology, the air pressure — ground motion relationship is essential to understand the coupling mechanism of air‐associated noise into the geophones. The CREWES Project at the University of Calgary undertook two air‐pressure recording experiments in western Canada to investigate using air‐pressure data (from microphones) to attenuate air‐coupled noise in geophones during two different seismic acquisition projects. A multichannel median filter was applied to the LMO‐corrected microphone data to enhance the strong air blast arrival and allowed us to study our recorded data in terms of sound propagation and attenuation, power spectra and signal consistency. Adaptive filtering techniques produced reasonable estimates of the embedded geophone noise using a reference noise input (i.e. pressure data from several microphones). We had success in suppressing the 60 Hz interference by using the Least‐Mean Squares (LMS) algorithm in a Finite‐Impulse Response adaptive filter. The results are quite encouraging and more complex adaptive filter algorithms and other filtering techniques are under study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207