Radiation Pressure–supported Starburst Disks and Active Galactic Nucleus Fueling
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Other designConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.950
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.483
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
We consider the structure of marginally Toomre-stable starburst disks under the assumption that radiation pressure on dust grains provides the dominant vertical support against gravity. This is particularly appropriate when the disk is optically thick to its own IR radiation, as in the central regions of ULIRGs. Because the disk radiates at its Eddington limit, the Schmidt-law for star formation changes in the optically-thick limit, with the star formation rate per unit area scaling as Sigma_g/kappa, where Sigma_g is the gas surface density and kappa is the mean opacity. We show that optically thick starburst disks have a characteristic flux and dust effective temperature of F ~ 10^{13} L_sun/kpc^2 and T_eff ~ 90K, respectively. We compare our predictions with observations and find good agreement. We extend our model from many-hundred parsec scales to sub-parsec scales and address the problem of fueling AGN. We assume that angular momentum transport proceeds via global torques rather than a local viscosity. We account for the radial depletion of gas due to star formation and find a strong bifurcation between two classes of disk models: (1) solutions with a starburst on large scales that consumes all of the gas with little fueling of a central AGN and (2) models with an outer large-scale starburst accompanied by a more compact starburst on 1-10 pc scales and a bright central AGN. The luminosity of the latter models is in many cases dominated by the AGN. We show that the vertical thickness of the starburst disk on pc scales can approach h ~ r, perhaps accounting for the nuclear obscuration in some Type 2 AGN. We also argue that the disk of young stars in the Galactic Center may be the remnant of such a compact nuclear starburst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Topic
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Field
- Physics and Astronomy
- Canadian institutions
- Canadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- PhysicsAstrophysicsStar formationEddington luminosityRadiation pressureLuminosityActive galactic nucleusOpacityFlux (metallurgy)ParsecGalaxyQuantum mechanics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes