MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014011626 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2014.6901008

Simulation of adaptive duty cycling in solar powered environmental monitoring systems

2014· article· en· W2014011626 on OpenAlexafffund
Michal Prauzek, Asher G. Watts, Petr Musı́lek, L. Wyard-Scott, Jiří Koziorek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCyclingComputer scienceDuty cycleEnvironmental scienceDutySystems engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses a simulator for energy management in wireless sensor platforms. The simulator presently focuses on environmentally powered monitoring systems and sensors described within this document. The Mathworks Simulink environment was used to construct the simulator and allows real meteorological data to be used for long term simulated operation under different energy management strategies. Three of these strategies are tested and presented here; one is dynamically controlled by a fuzzy rule based system which allows it to adapt to the environmental energy profile, while the other two are statically controlled for comparison. The static control strategies seek to minimize energy related failures or to maximize the number of stored measurements disregarding failures. Ultimately, the strategy which allows the simulated sensor platform to adapt its operational level to the energy available in the environment is superior. It produces a data set with the highest number of data points and a very low number of consecutive device failures. It performs better in both areas than either of the other static energy management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207