MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014012391 · doi:10.1117/12.738651

A method of examination of liquids by neural network analysis of reflectometric time domain data from optical capillaries and fibers

2007· article· en· W2014012391 on OpenAlexaff
M. Borecki, Michael L. Korwin-Pawlowski, Maria Bebłowska

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical fiberFiber optic sensorSIGNAL (programming language)Materials scienceReflection (computer programming)OpticsOptical time-domain reflectometerTime domainFresnel equationsNumerical apertureFiberAcousticsWavelengthRefractive indexFiber optic splitterComputer scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the construction and working principles of a reflectometric intelligent fiber-optic sensor used for liquid examination. Unlike other well-known fiber optical sensors which use information from optical wavelength variations, the proposed system uses time domain data. The sensing element consists of a length of optical fiber and a short section of optical capillary and works on the reflection intensity basis. The reflected signal level depends on the optical construction of the sensor element. The changes of the monitored signal are caused mainly by variation in light propagation conditions at the interfaces of liquid and gaseous phases. The physical effects involved are Fresnel reflection, local numerical aperture variation and liquid lenses formation. It is possible to call out across the changes of those effects by introducing a measuring procedure which includes submerging, submersion, emerging and emergence of the sensing head from the examined liquid or by local heating of the liquid sample.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207