SEED-Config: A case-based reasoning system for conceptual building design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A case-based design functionality is a natural and intuitive addition to a design tool that can augment human capabilities and help designers remember and retrieve appropriate cases. SEED-Config, a design environment for conceptual building design, was developed to incorporate a case-based reasoning functionality to provide designers with initial potential solutions. The case representation in SEED-Config is the BENT information model, which records design knowledge, supports the hierarchical decomposition of design cases, offers multiple views, and encapsulates the outcome of the design in addition to the problem specification and the design solution. The case library was implemented in an object-oriented database management system to accumulate cases automatically and to provide efficient query facilities. The case retrieval aspect of SEED-Config offers three different methods to find the most useful cases stored in the case library: task-based, lineage-based, and customized. Case retrieval responds to the exploratory nature of the design process and supports versatile case retrieval by providing multiple paths to each case. The case adaptation aspect, which adjusts the selected case to the new problem to provide a complete solution, uses an adaptation method called derivational replay. The case-based design capabilities are completely integrated within the design environment from which the cases originate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".