MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014041042 · doi:10.1177/0003603x15573755

A Timeline of the East–West Relationship

2015· article· en· W2014041042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Antitrust Bulletin · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimelineLiberalizationChinaCommunismSovereign wealth fundBusinessSovereigntyState (computer science)Equity (law)International tradeForeign direct investmentEconomicsMarket economyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using datasets that range from 1979 to 2014, this article outlines the overseas acquisitions of natural resource, infrastructure, and technology equity in the United States and Canada by Chinese firms. In particular, it examines the liberalization of Chinese Communist Party attitudes toward capital outflows and considers alterations of antitrust policies in the United States and Canada that have been developed as a result of Chinese sovereign wealth fund activity. Although a brief clarification of what constitutes a state-owned versus a private enterprise is provided, the article focuses on reviewing the specific regulations that govern foreign direct investments made in the United States and Canada by Chinese entities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it