Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans sa Poétique du cinéma, Raoul Ruiz cite l'émir Abdel Kader, qui utilise la figure de l'appareil photographique comme allégorie du rapport entre Dieu et les créatures : Dieu est invisible, mais la reproduction de ce négatif initial qu'est son image constitue les créatures et le papier des photos reproduites (Materia prima) correspond à la disponibilité du possible. Selon ses propres termes, Raoul Ruiz fait une lecture oblique d'Abdel Kader : en partant d'une perspective néoplatonicienne, il confine les réflexions de l'émir au statut des ombres projetées sur l'image (de Dieu) dans leur rapport avec la réalité. Ma lecture, peut-être oblique elle aussi, prétend jeter les bases d'une théorie fondée sur la dimension politique du soufisme et la conception soufie des ombres chinoises, qui pourrait expliquer le statut du cinéma et son rapport intrinsèque avec le mélodrame dans les pays de culture islamique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".