L’implication du clergé et du laïcat dans les ciné-clubs étudiants au Québec, 1949-1970
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article insiste tout particulièrement sur l’implication du clergé et du laïcat dans l’histoire du mouvement des ciné-clubs étudiants au Québec durant les décennies 1950 et 1960. Issus des mouvements d’Action catholique, les ciné-clubs étudiants se sont développés, à l’intérieur de la structure ecclésiale, dans le but de répondre aux problèmes de manque de culture, de préparation déficiente et de sens critique insuffisamment aiguisé en matière de cinéma. L’évolution des ciné-clubs reflète les différentes préoccupations du clergé et du laïcat à l’égard de l’éducation cinématographique au Québec. La présente analyse des rapports entre les clercs et les laïcs, au sein de ces organisations, permet même d’entrevoir le bouillonnement d’idées qui a alors annoncé les profondes transformations qu’allait connaître la société québécoise à partir des années 1960.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".