MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014084502 · doi:10.1117/12.429520

<title>Shape and spatial color information extraction for image retrieval</title>

2001· article· en· W2014084502 on OpenAlexaff
P. Androutsos, Diana Ferrari, Allen Ly, Andrew Persaud, Dimitrios Androutsos, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, A.N. Venetsanopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSearch engine indexingComputer visionImage retrievalBasis (linear algebra)Invariant (physics)Set (abstract data type)Information retrievalPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital visual data has bene rapidly becoming more and more ubiquitous, and so content-based techniques to perform indexing are imperative. This paper outlines research geared towards an image retrieval system that identifies shapes in images and classify them into appropriate categories. The system functions on pre-processed, segmented images extracting component regions on the basis of color. This is followed by shape analysis using invariant moments with perceptual considerations made on the basis of subjective testing. The subjectivity is incorporated into the system via a set of thresholds whose strictness can be manipulated by the user. The implementation employing SQL and DB2 provided and 84 percent placement rate for the various images investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3460.271

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207