Bacteremia in Lung Transplant Recipients in the Current Era
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current trends in the epidemiology, outcome and variables influencing mortality in bacteremic lung transplant recipients have not been fully described. We prospectively studied bacteremias in lung transplant recipients in a multicenter study between 2000-2004. Bacteremia was documented in 56 lung transplant recipients, an average of 172 days after transplantation. Multiple antibiotic resistance was documented in 48% of the isolates; these included 57% of the Gram-negative and 38% of the Gram-positive bacteria. Pulmonary infection was the most common source of resistant gram-negative bacteremias. Mortality rate at 28 days after the onset of bacteremia was 25% (14/56). Mechanical ventilation and abnormal mental status correlated independently with higher mortality (p < 0.05 for both variables). Bacteremia remains a significant complication in lung transplant recipients and is associated with considerable mortality. Recognition of variables portending a high risk for antibiotic resistance and for poor outcome has implications relevant for optimizing antibiotic prescription and for improving outcomes in lung transplant recipients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".