MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014121312 · doi:10.4000/danse.1005

Des danseuses qui écrivent. Margitta Roséri : le tour du monde de la danse

2015· article· fr· W2014121312 on OpenAlex
Claudia Jeschke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches en danse · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le phénomène des danseuses du XIXe siècle qui écrivent sur (leur) danse a été sous‑estimé dans l’historiographie. Margitta Roséri est née en Allemagne et a eu une carrière internationale couronnée de succès en Europe, aux États-Unis et en Amérique Centrale ; dans ses mémoires, elle présente un aperçu de sa profession en relatant non seulement ses réussites et ses échecs artistiques et sociaux, mais en portant aussi un regard critique sur la pratique et la conception de la danse de son temps. Elle a également pénétré dans le champ masculin de l’auctorialité en rédigeant un manuel sur l’art de la danse. Les écrits de Roséri suggèrent une lecture différenciée des agentivités incorporées des danseuses et des exigences liées à leur statut, selon les cultures, et permettent ainsi une relecture des stratégies performatives des femmes artistes dans le ballet à la fin du XIXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it