MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014155212 · doi:10.1093/ehr/cel354

Leisure and Recreation in a Victorian Mining Community: The Social Economy of Leisure in North-East England, 1820-1914

2006· article· en· W2014155212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
DUNCAN BYTHELL

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmateurScrutinyRecreationDiversity (politics)HistorySociologyPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1970s, the development of mass leisure in general, and of major sports in particular, has presented a fertile field for research to historians of modern British society. Alan Metcalfe—a Geordie whose academic career in the discipline of kinesiology has been pursued in Canada—has broken new ground by taking the microscope to a small, compact, and distinctive industrial region in order to unravel the complexity and the diversity of its popular culture in the decades before the First World War. The scope of his study is narrower than his title implies. Although it includes a chapter on ‘non-sporting leisure’, this is very much a history of sport; and the ‘mining community’ under scrutiny consists of the fifty or so pit-villages of the small Northumberland coalfield, north of the Tyne, rather than the Great Northern Coalfield as a whole. Within these limits, however, a good deal of ground is covered in a thorough and thoughtful fashion. Professor Metcalfe offers a wealth of detail, first, on the remarkable longevity of such ‘traditional’ pitmen's pastimes as cock-fighting and potshare bowling; second, on the gradual transformation of ‘old’ sports like pigeon-racing and athletics; third, on those two spectacular crazes of the 1890s, billiards and bicycles; and finally, on soccer, as the ‘beautiful game’ evolved towards commercialisation and professionalism, while at the same time establishing itself as the major participation sport among the working class. All these developments are analysed in terms of their significance for community life and relationships within the coalfield; but Metcalfe also takes pains to point out ways in which the experience of east Northumberland may have differed from that of other parts of the country. Particularly striking is his emphasis on the economic booms of the early 1870s and, more particularly, the later 1890s in providing favourable conditions for major new developments in both the range and the organisation of sporting activity among the miners. The crucial role in all this of the miner-controlled Social clubs and Institutes which mushroomed in the pit villages during the two decades before the First World War is especially well illustrated. But for all its merits, Metcalfe's book leaves some important themes largely unexplored. As he himself points out, because the world of sport was a man's world, the women of the coalfield are virtually excluded. Consequently, several popular domestic pastimes, appropriate to the family circle—such as reading (and being read to), and playing card games—are ignored. Although annual flower shows and Sunday School picnics get a mention, community celebrations of exceptional national events—such as the Queen's jubilees in 1887 and 1897, or the coronations of 1902 and 1911—escape notice. Similarly, little attention is given to the fact that many (although not all) of the sports under consideration were age-specific as well as gender-specific. In other words, they appealed chiefly to young men during that brief interlude between school and marriage—a time of life when sporting pursuits had also to leave room for gentle dalliance and serious courtship. Finally, although the opportunities for recreation may have brought purpose and pleasure to many pitmen's lives, the use of one's ‘free time’ was, in the end, a matter of individual choice. Choice was, of course, limited to what was locally available; and it was partly shaped by family traditions and peer-pressure. As Metcalfe points out, leisure activity was always constrained by ‘time, money, and space’; but it also depended crucially on individual inclination and personal commitment. Man does not live by football alone; and the range of options open, even to Northumberland pitmen a century ago, was wider than the present study appears to suggest. Why some men chose one option, and some another; how often they changed their minds and pursued new fads and fashions; and how much time, effort and money they were able and willing to commit to their ‘hobbies’ at different stages of their lives, are questions which remain unanswered in this useful but narrowly-focused book.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe English Historical ReviewSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207