MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014174333 · doi:10.1080/10640266.2010.490125

Eating Disorder Symptom Severity Scale: A New Clinician Rated Measure

2010· article· en· W2014174333 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine A. Henderson, Annick Buchholz, Julie Perkins, Sarah Jane Norwood, Nicole Obeid, Wendy Spettigue, Stephen Feder

Bibliographic record

VenueEating Disorders · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaYork UniversityCarleton UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCronbach's alphaInternal consistencyClinical psychologyPsychiatryPsychologyScale (ratio)Eating disordersEating Disorder InventoryPsychometricsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes the development and validation of the clinician-rated Eating Disorder Symptom Severity Scale (EDS3), created to address a gap in measurement options for youth with eating disorders. The EDS3 is modeled on the Childhood Severity and Acuity of Psychiatric Illness Scales (Lyons, J. S, 1998 Lyons, J. S. 1998. “The Severity and Acuity of Psychiatric Illness Scales Manual – Child and adolescent version”. In San Antonio, Harcourt Brace & Company, TX: The Psychological Corporation. [Google Scholar]). Factor analysis revealed a 5-factor solution and accounted for 78% of the variance, and internal consistency within the subscales was good (Cronbach alphas: 0.69 to 0.93). The EDS3 is a valid and reliable measure designed for clinicians to help assess the severity of a youth's eating disorder and to facilitate outcomes research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEating DisordersSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207