The combination of an electrospray ion source and an electrostatic storage ring for lifetime and spectroscopy experiments on biomolecules
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An electrospray ion source has been coupled to an accelerator that injects ions into an electrostatic heavy-ion storage ring. Since the dc ion current produced by electrospray ionization is low (∼106 ions/s), ions are accumulated in a cylindrical ion trap filled with a helium buffer gas. The ions are collisionally damped in the buffer gas and confined to the central trap region by a rf field. Extraction from the trap occurs within a few microseconds and after acceleration through 22 kV, the ions of interest are selected by a magnet according to their mass to charge ratio. The ion bunch is subsequently injected into the ring. Both positive and negative ions have been stored, with masses ranging over 3 orders of magnitude (∼102–104 Da). From a pickup signal in the ring, the number of ions in a bunch is estimated to be of the order of 103–104 when the accumulation time is 0.1 s. Our first measurements show that we can store a sufficient number of ions to study the decay of metastable ions and to determine relative destruction cross sections. The technique could be useful to probe conformers differing only in size. Furthermore, our setup can be used for spectroscopic measurements of the ion-photon interaction such as the excitation of [Cytochrome c+17H]17+ protein ions with 532 nm photons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it