Acute Appendicits in Pregnancy: Evaluation of 129 Patients During 20 years
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common non-obstetric emergency requiring surgery during pregnancy, and delayed diagnosis is associated with a greater risk of fetal or maternal morbidity and fetal loss. The aim of this study is to analyze the diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy, along with maternal and fetal complications. Methods : Between January 1990 and December 2010, 129 pregnant women who were operated on due to acute appendicitis were evaluated retrospectively. Results : The mean age of patients was 28.3 ± 6.6 years, and the time from presentation of symptoms to admission was 41.1 ± 33.2 hours. The most common complaints were lower right quadrant pain (66.7%) and nausea-vomiting (65.1%). The most common physical signs were abdominal tenderness and rebound. Gestational stage at diagnosis was second trimester in 74 patients, first trimester in 31 patients, and third trimester in 24 patients. The perforation rate among our cases was 28.7%. The perforation–associated with delayed admission to the hospital (P = 0.001) was the most common in the first trimester with a rate of 40.5%. Morbidity occurred in 41 patients (31.8%). Fetal mortality occurred in 1 (1.1%) of non-perforated patients, and in 5 of the perforated patients (13.5%). No maternal mortality occurred. Mean hospital stay was 2.8 ± 0.9 days in non-perforated patients, while 5.3 ± 2.2 days in perforated patients (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Because of the nonspecific and pregnancy-attributed symptoms, acute appendicitis during pregnancy may result in an increased risk of fetomaternal morbidity and fetal mortality. doi:10.4021/jcs17w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it