MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014200970 · doi:10.15238/tujise.2014.1.2.1-41

ONE OF THE MILESTONES OF ISLAMIC ECONOMICS: ABU YUSUF AND HIS ECONOMIC THOUGHT

2014· article· en· W2014200970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oğuz Bal

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamCivilizationGeniusFiqhSummitQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)LawPoliticsIslamic economicsShariaPolitical sciencePhilosophyReligious studiesSociologyTheologyHistoryArt historyGeographyArchaeologyCartographyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abu Yusuf (729-798), was born in Kufa. He, who had be lived in the last quarter of the eighth century; is one of the most efficient personalities of Islamic Civilization. Abu Yusuf; within of Hanafi school who is the one of fiqh schools of the science of fiqh it has been created and developed by Islamic civilization; as he during own time was reached to the summit, at the same time, had created affect penetrating the centuries in the case laws. Under Islamic tradition; worships and transactions and at the other subjects, vastly his views apply. In particular, the case law on foundations in practice still continues. In lived period; made effort against for the most complex social, political and economic problems in the book and the Sunnah light, finding a solution, his was thanks to genius. "Kitab al Harac" is his most important work.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15238/tujise.201428094

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207