MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014207266 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2011.6115541

Wireless technology agnostic real-time localization in urban areas

2011· article· en· W2014207266 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Amine Abid, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilaterationRSSSignal strengthComputer scienceRadio propagationTransmitterWirelessReal-time computingShadow mappingTransmitter power outputWireless networkNode (physics)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Location estimation is a fundamental middleware for enabling location based services. Different Radio propagation models, customarily used in wireless networks planning, can be useful for localizing mobile nodes by estimating the transmitter receiver distance from the Received Signal Strength (RSS). However, most of these localization methods need a prior knowledge of the Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) to determine a target location and may suffer from imprecisions that can undermine the purpose of localization. In this paper, we propose a new technique called TR2S2 (Trilateration based on Ratio of Received Signal Strength). Though also based on RSS, the method improves location estimation accuracy compared to classical trilateration algorithms and does not need a knowledge of the EIRP. TR2S2 was applied using different deterministic and statistical radio propagation models in different settings. The results show that location estimation is every time more accurate than other compared methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207