MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014213340 · doi:10.4043/24548-ms

An Implementation of ISO 19906 Formulae for Global Sea Ice Loads within a Probabilistic Framework

2014· article· en· W2014213340 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Fuglem, Martín Richard, Tony King

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceScalingRandomnessScale (ratio)Computer scienceGeologyMathematicsStatisticsClimatologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ISO 19906 standard provides guidance for the calculation of characteristic ice loads on offshore structures in arctic and cold regions. Ice failure is a complex process and the development and improvement of ice load models can be challenging, in large part because of difficulties obtaining full-scale data and scaling issues when extrapolating small-scale test data. Many of the ice load models referenced in ISO 19906 were developed during arctic exploration in the 70's and 80's. Typically, simplified geometries are assumed for both the structure and ice features in order to obtain analytic solutions; other simplifications may be incorporated appropriate for the specific applications considered and information available. A significant proportion of referenced models provide the maximum load during an interaction, rather than the development of the load over time. This can be a limitation were penetration into a thick ridge is limited by available driving force and kinetic energy. Given the large variety of ice conditions to which a structure may be subjected and the apparent randomness in ice fracture and damage mechanisms, there can be considerable variation in loads. Ice strength may be set to a characteristic fixed value, the ISO model for global sea ice loads is based on a relationship that considers ice thickness and contact width and is based on upper envelop fits to failure data. When determining the appropriate characteristic load on a structure, consideration should be given to exposure (i.e., the number and durations of ice interactions). Loads based on characteristic values for parameters such as ice thickness and ice strength could be inaccurate for scenarios where the exposure is significantly different than that on which the characteristic values were based. The application of probabilistic methods can be used to account for differences in exposure. While ISO 19906 references such methods, guidelines on implementation is limited. This paper examines issues in implementing available formulae for ice loads on fixed structures within a probabilistic framework and shows how characteristic ice loads differ depending on the model and assumptions used. The Sea Ice Loads Software (SILS), a probabilistic framework developed by C-CORE for calculating characteristic ice loads using the methods referenced in ISO19906, is used for the analyses and comparisons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207