MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014232750 · doi:10.1080/13825577.2013.797208

RE-WORLDING THE BALKANS Films of voyage to the European Union

2013· article· en· W2014232750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of English Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBalkans: History, Politics, Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardEuropean Commission
KeywordsEuropean unionSolidarityCommunismCapitalismPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)Political economyPoliticsSociologyEconomic historyHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The 1990s Yugoslav wars have been viewed as paradigmatic of the post-communist turmoil whose extreme articulation finds fertile ground in the stereotypically bellicose Balkans. If in these discourses the Balkans are a metonymy for the violence of Eastern European post-communist transitions, then Yugoslavia is itself a metonymy for the Balkans. However, films made in the post-Yugoslav space in the last decade move away from processing the trauma of the 1990s wars, and no longer fit neatly within this ‘Balkanist’ discourse. Instead, they turn outward: to the elusive goal of either joining the European Union or being legitimated as ‘European’, as well as to situating the Balkans in the context of global migrancy of labour increasingly knocking at the doors of ‘Fortress Europe’. Želimir Žilnik’s Fortress Europe (2001) and Damjan Kozole’s Spare Parts (2003) show how the Balkans are increasingly deterritorialised as a self-contained discursive and political space as they become a bridge to Europe for non-European and other Eastern European immigrants, a situation that creates possibilities for solidarity with globally disenfranchised multitudes. In turn, Paskaljević’s Honeymoons (2009) establishes possible nodes of intra-Balkan solidarity as it explores the shared tribulations of various Balkan migrants attempting to enter the EU. The films end up subverting the EU motto ‘united in diversity’ by highlighting intersections between its neocolonial immigration practices and the contingent labour demands of neoliberal capitalism. Keywords: filmBalkansEuropean UnionYugoslaviaimmigrationcapitalismbordersŽilnikKozolePaskaljević Notes 1. Iordanova explains that the new pan-Balkan cinematic consciousness is evident in ‘the Balkan sidebars at the festivals in Thessaloniki, Istanbul, Sarajevo, Sofia, and others, all showcasing the recent production of the region, through the South East European film network, to a variety of projects and publications’ (2006: 11). Also of note is the Trieste Film Festival, as well as established film festivals across former Yugoslavia, such as Pula, Belgrade, and Subotica. 2. While Slovene cinema produces sombre dramas of social marginalisation in the face of neocapitalism and neonationalism, Croatian cinema inclines ‘toward introspective, psychological probing as a way of commenting on more general processes taking place in society’, which is quite different from ‘Serbia and even Bosnia and Herzegovina, whose film schools have thus far been more notable for their carnivalistic approach and exploitation of dark humour’ (Vidan, Citation2011). 3. See special issues on Serbian and Croatian cinema, Kinokultura 8 (2009) and 11 (2011), respectively. 4. Wood often mentions the Balkan trope in her book, but dedicates only one paragraph to ‘Balkan directors’ themselves (2007: 128). Employing a different approach, Luisa Rivi (Citation2007) places into conversation films from both Eastern and Western Europe and interrogates the notion of ‘Europe’ by contextualising it as a fundamentally postcolonial concept. 5. Fortress Europe was shown at many European festivals and received the ‘Victor Award’ for Best Film of the Year in Ljubljana. Spare Parts, which won awards at several Balkan festivals and was nominated for a Golden Bear in Berlin, screened at more than 50 international film venues. Honeymoons was featured at over 30 international festivals, including Toronto and Venice; it won the Grand Prix at Valladolid and the FIPRESCI Award. 6. Achille Mbembe’s essay ‘Necropolitics’ explores contemporary sovereign prerogatives of the ‘right to kill’. Sovereign power is ‘deployed in the interest of maximum destruction of persons and the creation of death-worlds, new and unique forms of social existence in which vast populations are subjected to conditions of life conferring upon them the status of living dead’ (Citation2003: 39–40). 7. Žilnik discusses this paradox in Steinberg (Citation2001). 8. For further critiques of transitioning Slovene society, see Kozole’s Labour Equals Freedom (2005) and Slovenian Girl (2009). Slovenia, the first former Yugoslav republic to enter the EU, is often portrayed as the only economically successful, socially liberal, and truly democratic ‘European’ country to emerge from 1990s ‘Balkan’ upheavals. As Meta Mazaj argues, ‘in a political and journalistic discourse, the process of Slovenia’s transition is an indisputably positive one, a true success story’ (2011b: 9). 9. Milica Bakić-Hayden defines ‘nesting Orientalisms’ as ‘the gradation of “Orients”’, or shifting hierarchies of Easternness and Westernness in the constructions of Balkan identities (Citation1995: 918).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it