Whatʼs new in peritoneal dialysis: biocompatibility and continuous flow peritoneal dialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines recent developments in the understanding of the effect of conventional, bioincompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids on structural and functional changes in the peritoneal membrane. Emphasis is placed on the clinically relevant outcome of failure of long-term peritoneal dialysis. Therapeutic strategies to prevent technique failure, including the use of new peritoneal dialysis fluids and continuous flow peritoneal dialysis, are explored. RECENT FINDINGS: Long-term (greater than 6 months) exposure to new peritoneal dialysis fluids with physiologic pH, lower lactate concentrations, or lower concentrations of glucose degradation products results in improved leukocyte cytokine release, ultrafiltration, and mesothelial cell mass, respectively. Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis allows efficient small molecule removal using dialysate with lower glucose concentration and possibly less glucose degradation products. Recent technical advances include creation of a double-lumen peritoneal dialysis catheter, and methods of monitoring intra-abdominal pressure and ultrafiltration. SUMMARY: Though initial reports with biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluids are promising, the efficacy of these new solutions in preventing long-term peritoneal dialysis failure is unproven. Conditions in which new peritoneal dialysis fluids may be beneficial are suggested. Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis requires substantial technical improvements before this technique can be widely accepted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".