MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014269643 · doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2014.09.001

Supporting the sexuality of the intellectually disabled: How institutional change and vocational training can help

2014· article· en· W2014269643 on OpenAlex
J.-S. Ménoreau, André Dupras

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexologies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare innovation and challenges
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityMindsetAction (physics)Vocational educationPsychologyOrder (exchange)Public relationsPedagogySociologyPolitical scienceBusinessGender studiesComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explains how peoples' attitudes have changed in past years to sexuality for the disabled. This change in attitude has been largely fostered by the extensive work of reflection on the involvement of the administrative authorities and the acquisition of new competences by carers, helping them to integrate this new mindset to the multitude of individual situations that can arise. By adopting a medical-social model, we have been able to move away from a "care-based" system towards a "support-based" system for helping clients with their sexuality. Professionals need theoretical and institutional landmarks in order to best meet client needs. Managers of care facilities must play a leading role in developing an institutional project for sexuality that will be a guideline for carers in deciding what action to take in a given situation to support the sexuality of residents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.273
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it