MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in children with myelomeningocele

2000· article· en· W2014306343 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Pulmonology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersAgence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs
KeywordsMedicineHypoventilationContinuous positive airway pressurePositive airway pressureAnesthesiaCentral sleep apneaHypoxemiaObstructive sleep apneaVentilation (architecture)Positive pressureSleep apneaApneaTonsillectomyPolysomnographyInternal medicineRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prevalence of moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with myelomeningocele may be as high as 20%, but little information is available regarding treatment of these patients. To assess the efficacy and complications of treatments for these children, we collected data on 73 patients from seven pediatric sleep laboratories. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, n = 30) and central apnea (n = 25) occurred more frequently than central hypoventilation (n = 12). We also describe a sleep-exacerbated restrictive lung disease type of SDB in 6 patients who had hypoxemia during sleep without apnea or central hypoventilation. For each type of SDB, effective treatments were identified in a stepwise process, moving towards more complex and invasive therapies. For OSA, adenotonsillectomy was often ineffective (10/14), whereas nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was usually successful (18/21). For central apnea, methylxanthines and/or supplemental oxygen proved sufficient in 2 of 9 and 3 of 6, respectively, but noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was required in 7 children. For central hypoventilation, supplemental oxygen (alone or with methylxanthines), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and tracheostomy with positive pressure ventilation were effective in 3, 2, and 2 patients, respectively. Sleep-exacerbated restrictive lung disease always required supplemental oxygen treatment, but in 2 cases also required noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; nutritional and orthopedic procedures also were helpful. Posterior fossa decompression was used for the first three types of SDB, but data were insufficient to delineate specific recommendations for or against its use. In summary, evaluation by an experienced, multidisciplinary team can establish an effective treatment regime for a child with myelomeningocele and SDB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it