MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014311735 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.10048

Delayed presentation of a detached resectoscope beak and and treatment with thulium laser

2011· article· en· W2014311735 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Niall F. Davis, Barry B. McGuire, Hugh D. Flood

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeakURETEROSCOPEUrethraMedicineLumen (anatomy)ThuliumSurgeryLaserGeologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraoperative detachment of a resectoscope beak is an extremely rare and unusual event. Retrieval of the ceramic beak can be difficult due to the sheath's large size relative to the urethral lumen. Our report describes the retrieval of a calcified ceramic resectoscope beak from the urinary bladder 4 years after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The calcified beak was successfully fragmented into 3 separate pieces with a thulium laser. This method allowed for safe removal of each fragment through the urethra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body InjuriesFrench-language works237,207