MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Venous Air Emboli Occur During Release of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Repositioning After Sitting Position Surgery

2002· article· en· W2014360269 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert J. Schmitt, Thomas M. Hemmerling

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSupine positionSittingAnesthesiaPositive end-expiratory pressurePatent foramen ovaleProne positionBlood pressureAir embolismSurgeryCardiologyMechanical ventilationInternal medicineComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: We studied the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) release and positioning on the occurrence of venous air embolism (VAE). Eighteen consecutive patients (8 women, 10 men; ASA grade I-III) undergoing neurosurgery in the sitting position were studied. After induction of anesthesia ventilation was controlled with a PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O in an oxygen-air gas mixture. A transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) probe was inserted. Preoperatively, a patent foramen ovale was excluded in all patients. TEE monitoring was performed during surgery, during PEEP release at the end of surgery with the patient still in the sitting position, and during change of the patient position into the supine position. The severity of VAE was differentiated as follows: grade 1 = only microbubbles; grade 2 = microbubbles and decrease of end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (PETCO(2)) by more than 1.5 mm Hg; grade 3 = microbubbles combined with a decrease of PETCO(2) by more than 1.5 mm Hg, and a decrease of mean arterial blood pressure by at least 20 mm Hg. During surgery, VAE with a grade of 1, 2 or 3 occurred in 7, 4, and 2 patients, respectively. After PEEP release, VAE of grades 1, 2, and 3 were observed in 7, 2, and 1 patients, respectively. During repositioning from sitting to supine position, VAE of grades 1, 2, and 3 was observed in 6, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. The patient with VAE grade 3 needed inotropic support until 2 h after surgery to maintain sufficient blood pressure. No patient showed any sign of paradoxical arterial embolism or cardiac dysfunction. We conclude that VAE occurs not only during surgery in the sitting position, but also with release of PEEP and during repositioning to the supine position. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that venous air embolism (VAE) occurs not only during surgery in the sitting position but also during positive end-expiratory pressure release and repositioning of the patient into the supine position. Continuous monitoring for VAE should be performed until the patient is returned to the supine position.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesia & AnalgesiaSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207