MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014361086 · doi:10.1520/jte102715

Edge Correction in Calculation of Dielectric Constant

2010· article· en· W2014361086 on OpenAlex
David E. Woolley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Testing and Evaluation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Canadian institutionsSaint-Gobain (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionConstant (computer programming)Materials scienceComposite materialMathematical analysisMathematicsGeometryComputer scienceOptoelectronicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract When relative permittivity (relative dielectric constant) is calculated based on capacitance data from an unshielded, two-electrode fixture, edge capacitance corrections should be used. Corrections are given in ASTM D150-98 for the case of thin electrodes (such as foil) in several configurations. The ASTM formulas are based on multiple linear regression analysis of data from Scott and Curtis. In this study, a finite-element model of the original measurement setup is developed, and the model is verified against the original data. The model is used to do additional numerical experiments, and these new data are used to extend the range of the original regression formulas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.311
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.130 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it