Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Robert Henryson's The Garmont of Gud Ladeis, a modest, compendious style corresponds to a high spiritual signification. Topical associations of the gift of clothing as an act of courtship are largely suppressed in The Garmont in order to heighten attention to the spiritual implications therein. In ten stanzas of common measure, reiterative syntactical patterns and plain diction, Henryson translates well-established ethical and exegetical themes into Scots verse practice. The relation is already integrally allegorical between the lyric and the clothing to which it refers. This allegory encapsulates the further allegory between the articles of clothing and the virtues they signify. Signification is presented in parallel in The Garmont and not in series, as in the arrangement of narrative and moralitas in The Fables, Orpheus and Eurydice and The Bludy Serk. Despite this structural difference, this neglected, deceptively simple lyric provides a useful vantage from which to consider Henryson's concept and treatment of style in his major works, The Fables in particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".