MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2014381990 · doi:10.1021/cr300340p

DNA-Mediated Homogeneous Binding Assays for Nucleic Acids and Proteins

2012· review· en· W2014381990 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hongquan Zhang, Feng Li, Brittany Dever, Xing‐Fang Li, X. Chris Le

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Reviews · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCitationHomogeneousLibrary sciencePhoneSocial mediaComputer scienceChemistryWorld Wide WebInformation retrievalMathematicsCombinatoricsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTDNA-Mediated Homogeneous Binding Assays for Nucleic Acids and ProteinsHongquan Zhang†, Feng Li‡, Brittany Dever‡, Xing-Fang Li†, and X. Chris Le*†‡View Author Information† Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G3‡ Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G2*E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: (780) 492-6416. Fax: (780) 492-7800.Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 4, 2812–2841Publication Date (Web):December 11, 2012Publication History Received16 August 2012Published online11 December 2012Published inissue 10 April 2013https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr300340phttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr300340preview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2012 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views13074Altmetric-Citations539LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Assays,Fluorescence,Genetics,Peptides and proteins,Probes Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations417
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ReviewsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207