Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur les poèmes en prose du Nigog , et plus précisément sur la façon dont ces poèmes forment un argument supplémentaire en faveur de la liberté artistique dans la querelle qui oppose les « exotiques » aux régionalistes. Après un examen de l’ambivalence formelle des poèmes en prose, l’article s’intéresse aux principes esthétiques qui sous-tendent le discours critique de la revue pour finalement montrer comment ces poèmes en prose s’inscrivent tacitement dans la logique argumentative de la revue, modifiant ainsi progressivement la conception du « poétique » qui a alors cours dans le champ littéraire. Les poèmes en prose publiés dans Le Nigog montrent bien la force « politique » du genre, c’est-à-dire le pouvoir de subversion institutionnelle que la notion de genre met en place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it